Impaired Cardiovascular Response to Exercise in Patients with Severe Asthma: A Case-Control Study
Athina Georgopoulou1, 2, Laskarina Fotiadou1, Stavros Tryfon1, Zoi Daniil2, 3, Afroditi K. Boutou1, 2, *
Identifiers and Pagination:Year: 2022
E-location ID: e187430642201170
Publisher ID: e187430642201170
Article History:Received Date: 27/4/2021
Revision Received Date: 15/9/2021
Acceptance Date: 24/12/2021
Electronic publication date: 15/03/2022
Collection year: 2021
open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Although asthmatics may present reduced exercise capacity, data on their cardiovascular responses during exercise testing have been scarcely investigated. The aim of this pilot case-control study is to test: a) whether double product (DP), an index of cardiovascular reserve, differs among patients with severe and mild-moderate asthma, and b) whether DP is associated with asthma control level, physical activity (PA) and exercise capacity, in asthmatics population.
Materials and Methods:
A group of patients with severe asthma (group S) and a matched group of patients with mild-moderate asthma (group M) was studied. All participants completed asthma control and physical activity (IPAC) questionnaires, lung function measurements and six-minute walk test. The exercise capacity (as 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and corresponding work), the Borg Dyspnea, the rating of perceived excursion and the average PA METS were recorded.
A total of 18 patients were studied. DP at exercise end was significantly lower in group S, compared to group M (16412.2±4732.1 vs. 18594.8±3984.4 mmHgXbpm; p=0.041) and was moderately associated with % predicted 6MWD (r=0.592; p=0.001). Group S patients were also presented with lower moderate intensity PA, compared to group M, while exercise capacity was similar between the groups. Asthma control level had no impact on exercise capacity nor PA parameters.
Patients with severe asthma may have impaired cardiovascular reserve as established by DP, even when exercise capacity is indifferent from patients with milder disease. As an easy-to-assess parameter, DP may offer further information in the functional evaluation of these patients.
Asthma is a heterogeneous chronic disorder characterized by airway inflammation and variable expiratory airflow limitation, with increasing prevalence and substantial burden of morbidity worldwide [1, 2]. Characteristic symptoms include wheezing, shortness of breath, chest tightness and cough, which vary over time in intensity and frequency of occurrence. Intense physical activity may provoke asthma-related symptoms, especially among individuals with insufficient asthma control; thus asthmatic patients often avoid exercise and adopt a sedentary lifestyle . However, recent advances in asthma management have changed this perception, so that the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) recommends that asthmatics should be engaged in regular physical activity, as this is proven to improve their overall health status, quality of life, severity of symptoms and even the level of asthma control [1, 3].
The 6-minute walking test (6MWT) is a simple, easy to perform, well-tolerated and widely utilized test for evaluating physical capacity among patients with chronic respiratory or other disorders [4, 5]. The six-minute walk distance (6MWD) is the primary outcome of the 6MWT and a prognostic measure in various diseases . However, during the 6MWT several other parameters can be evaluated, which may offer further clinical information but are far less frequently recorded. The double product, that is the product of peak heart rate and maximum systolic blood pressure, is an index of cardiovascular reserve and an estimate of the maximal performance of the left ventricle, which can be evaluated at the end of 6MWT . However, it has been hardly ever measured in patients with respiratory disorders, while data on its association with disease severity and levels of physical capacity are currently scarce.
Based on the aforementioned, the current study aims to investigate, for the first time: a) whether DP assessed at the end of 6MWT differs between patients with severe and mild/moderate asthma, and b) whether levels of asthma control, physical activity and exercise capacity are associated with exercise DP in asthmatic patients.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
A group of patients with severe asthma (Group S) and a gender-, age- and body mass index-matched group of asthmatic patients with mild-moderate asthma (Group M), diagnosed according to GINA guidelines (1) who attended the Asthma Clinic of the NHS Department of Respiratory Medicine, G Papanikolaou Hospital between September 2019 and December 2019 constituted the study population. Mild asthma was defined as asthma that was well controlled with Step 1 or Step 2 treatment, that is, with as needed inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/formoterol alone, or with low intensity maintenance controller treatment. Moderate asthma was defined as asthma that was well controlled with Step 3 treatment, e.g., low dose ICS / long-acting beta agonist (LABA) and severe asthma was defined as asthma that required Step 4 or Step 5 treatment (e.g., high dose ICS /LABA) to prevent it from becoming “uncontrolled, or asthma that remained “uncontrolled”, despite this treatment . All patients were stable without any exacerbations or hospitalizations due to asthma or other causes or changes in asthma-specific medication in the last three months prior to study entry. Patients with a) uncontrolled asthma, b) serious musculoskeletal disorders that interfered with normal physical activity, c) mental disorders that did not allow comprehending and consenting to the protocol, d) arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) at rest <92%, e) other concomitant respiratory disorders, f) smoking history (current smokers or ex-smokers with smoking history ≥10 pack/years or smoking cessation within less than 12 months) were excluded from study entry. All patients provided informed, written consent for study participation, the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies /b3/ index.html) were followed, and the Scientific Review Board Committee of General Hospital “G. Papanikolaou” approved the study protocol (138/2019).
In more detail, the patient matching was conducted as follows: All asthmatic patients aged 18-80 years old with asthma diagnosis of at least one year, that had participated in clinical trials regarding asthma in the previous 3 years, and were, so, recorded in a clinical database of the Department for Respiratory Medicine, were theoretically eligible for study recruitment. The database included 42 patients and selection was done according to the following procedure: patients were first separated according to severity. For every patient with severe asthma, we tried to match another patient with mild-moderate asthma and similar BMI, gender and age. Thus, following a procedure of 1:1 matching, we created two groups of 10 patients each. These patients were called and asked to participate in the study and given a new informed consent. However, 2 female patients in group M decided to withdraw their consent, so a group of 8 mild-moderate and a group of 10 severe asthma patients were eventually included in the study protocol.
2.2. Study Protocol
This is a pilot case-control study. All study data were prospectively collected. Study patients arrived at the clinic in the morning after receiving their regular medication and undergoing a detailed clinical evaluation. To continue with further testing, patients had to have a priori heart rate <100 beats/min and systolic blood pressure <180 mmHg at the day of evaluation, at rest, or else they were asked to repeat the visit within 3-5 days. All participants then completed:
(a) The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ, short form): it is a 9-item, self-completed instrument used for the evaluation of PA, by summing up vigorous, moderate and walking PAs over the previous seven-day period and generating a total physical activity score (PAscore), expressed in MET-minutes per week (MET.min/wk) . A Greek version of IPAQ-short has been previously used in the Eurobarometer survey conducted by the European Union .
(b) The Asthma Control Test (ACT): It is a 5-item, self-completed tool with 4-week recall (on symptoms and daily functioning) for identifying those with poorly controlled asthma . Each item is scored with a 5-point scale (1=not controlled at all; 5=totally controlled) and the higher the scores, the greater the asthma control. The scores range from 5 (poor control of asthma) to 25 (complete control of asthma); an ACT score >19 indicates well-controlled asthma. ACT has been translated and validated for the Greek population .
(c) The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ): It is a self-completed tool with a 7-day recall of symptoms; the 5-item questionnaire was used in this study (ACQ-5). Each item is scored on a 7-point scale (0=no impairment; 6=maximum impairment) and scores range between 0 (totally controlled) and 6 (severely uncontrolled) . Based on the average values, asthma is well controlled when ACQ <0.75. The ACQ has been previously translated and validated for the Greek population .
Following, participants underwent lung function measurement (Omnia Pulmonary Function Testing Lab by COSMED@, Rome, Italy), according to American Thoracic Society (ATS)/ European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines  including post-bronchodilation Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1), Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), Total Lung Capacity (TLC), Residual Volume (RV), Inspiratory Capacity (IC), Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF), Forced Expiratory Flow 25-75 (FEF25-75) and lung diffusion (Diffusion Capacity of lung for carbon monoxide; DLCO and carbon monoxide transfer coefficient; KCO). The reference values applied were Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) 2012 . After at least 30 minutes rest, all patients completed a 6-minute walking test (6MWT) on a flat 33m corridor, followed by 3 minutes of recovery, according to ATS guidelines ; the distance walked (6MWD, m) was recorded. SpO2, vs pulse oxymetry, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure, vs cuff manometer, were measured at rest, at the end of exercise test and at the end of recovery. Heart rate was measured at rest, at the end of the test and at 1, 2 and 3 minutes of recovery. The 0-10 Borg Dyspnea (BorgD)  and the 0-10 Borg Rating of Perceived Excursion (RPE)  were assessed before and at the end of the 6MWT. Double product was calculated as the product of systolic blood pressure and heart rate before 6MWT (rest), at the end of the exercise test and at the end of recovery (3rd minute).
2.3. Statistical Analysis
The entire analysis was conducted using the IBM SPSS Statistics 20 (CA, USA). Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (mean ± SD) or median [interquartile range] depending on the normality of distribution, while categorical variables as % percentages. The predicted 6MWD was also calculated based on the equation: predicted 6MWD= 1.250 X height – 2.816 X age -39.07 X gender + 518.853 (where female=1 and male=0) . The %predicted 6MWD was then calculated as (6MWD X 100)/predicted 6MWD. The 6-minute walk distance work (6MWork) was calculated as the product of 6MWD X Bodyweight (m X kg) . The Shapiro-Wilk test was applied to exam the normality of distribution for quantitative variables. The Student’s t-test for Independent Samples or the Mann -Whitney U test was used for group comparisons of continuous variables, depending on their distribution of values and the Chi Square was applied for group comparisons of categorical variables. The Pearson r or the Spearman rho were utilized to indicate correlations between continuous variables. P <0.05 was considered significant for all comparisons.
Eighteen subjects (14 male, 4 female; age: 53.9±14.9 years) were included in the study. Ten subjects (age range 39-72 years old) presented with severe asthma (Group S) and the rest 8 gender- age- and BMI- matched patients (age range 40-78 years old) presented with mild-moderate asthma (Group M). The baseline characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 1. Patients’ regular treatment were as follow: ICS/LABA (33.3%), ICS/LABA + long-acting muscarinic agonist (LAMA) (33.3%), ICS/LABA + monoclonal antibody (16.7%), ICS/LABA + leukotriene antagonist (11.1%) and leukotriene antagonist (5.6%). No patient received extra short-acting beta agonist (SABA) before visiting the clinic.
3.2. Level of Asthma Control
Based on ACT, 61.1% of patients had good and 38.9% had poor asthma control. Of those with good asthma control, 63.6% had mild-moderate, while 36.4% had severe asthma, while among those with poor asthma control, 14.3% had mild-moderate, while 85.7% had severe asthma (p=0.04). Based on ACQ, 44.4% had good, 27.8% had poor asthma control, while another 27.8% were in an intermediate condition. Among patients with mild-moderate asthma most had well-controlled asthma (87.5% based on ACT and 62.5% based on ACQ) and normal spirometry (75%). In the S group, 40% according to ACT or 30% according to ACQ had controlled asthma, while no patient had normal spirometry (that is normal FEV1, normal FVC and normal FEV1/FVC).
3.3. Level of Physical Activity
Average METs/week were 2916.9±2737.7 and only 4 subjects (22.4%) were complied to physical activity levels, as suggested by WHO for subjects >18 years old. Only three subjects presented high PA, 12 (66.7%) moderate PA and the rest 16.7% PA. Exercise capacity, Borg dyspnea, RPE score and double product are presented in Table 2.
|Variable||Group S||Group M||p|
|Gender, male/female (n)||2/10||2/8||NS|
|Body Mass Index, kg/m2||32.2 (9)||31.6 (8)||NS|
|ACT||18 (10)||24 (10)||NS|
|ACQ||0.9 (2.20)||0.5 (2.8)||NS|
|FEV1, %||73.4 ± 25.6||95.5 ± 12.5||0.004|
|FVC, %||82.6 ± 15.7||96.3 ± 9.6||0.006|
|Tiffenau||73.1 ± 11.1||80.5 ± 7.2||NS|
|PEF,(L)||5.8 ±1.9||6.9 ± 2.6||NS|
|DLCO, %||78.7 ± 13.4||80.5 ± 10,2||NS|
|KCO, %||101.5 ± 14.2||95.5 ± 10.1||NS|
|TLC, %||95.1 ± 17,9||105 ± 6.5||NS|
|FRC, %||89.8 ± 21.9||100.2 ± 15.5||NS|
|RV/TLC||113.6 ± 21.9||91.5 ± 32||NS|
|RV, %||107.4 ± 37.8||93.6 ± 30||NS|
|Variable||Group S||Group M||p|
|PA average, METS||2916.9±2737.7||3104.8±1268.2||NS|
|Mild PA, METS||414.8±426.2||699.2±943.7||NS|
|Moderate PA, METS||1770.5±1026.5||2070.9±1494||0.043|
|Intense PA, METS||720±2113.6||540±703.9||NS|
|6MWork, m X kg||41142±6832.2||43865.6±19363.2||NS|
|BorgD, rest||2 (4)||0 (5)||NS|
|BorgD, end||3 (8)||0.5 (5)||0.026|
|RPE, rest||0 (5)||0 (3)||NS|
|RPE, rest||1 (7)||1 (3)||NS|
|Double Product rest, mmHgXbpm||8598.5±1006.5||8623.1±2178.6||NS|
|Double Product end, mmHgXbpm||16412±4732.1||18594±3984.4||0.041|
|Double Product recovery, mmHgXbpm||9488±2155.1||9830±2298.5||NS|
|HR, 1st minute of recovery||94.1±13.8||87.9±11.9||NS|
|HR, 2nd minute of recovery||79.9±11.9||80.3±12.2||NS|
|HR, 3rd minute of recovery||75.9±10.7||75.4±10.1||NS|
3.4. Group Differences
Double-product at exercise end was significantly lower in Group S, compared to Group M (18594.8±3984.4 vs. 16412.2±4732.1 mmHgXbpm; p=0.041), while BorgD was significantly higher (Table 3). Although total METs were similar between the groups, group S had significantly lower moderate intensity physical activity, compared to Group M. However, 6MWD (both absolute and %predicted), 6MWWork, ACT score, ACQ and RPE were similar between the groups (Table 2). Moreover, the values of HR during the 1st, 2nd and 3rd minutes of recovery between the groups were also similar. Table 3 presents the absolute and the %predicted values of HR at the end of 6MWT for each patient. In M group the HR% predicted was 62.7±11.3%, while in the S group it was 66.8±10.9% (p>0.05), indicating similar exercise intensity between the groups.
When subjects were compared according to asthma control based on ACT, none of the above parameters were found to be different (data not shown).
Double product at the end of 6MWT was significantly and positively correlated to 6MWD %predicted (r=0.592; p=0.010) (Fig. 1).
|Patient||Absolute HR at 6MWT End||% Predicted HR at 6MWT End||Group|
|Fig. (1). The positive, linear association between double product and 6-minute walking distance (% predicted).|
In this preliminary case-control report, we indicated that patients with severe asthma presented with lower double product at the end of 6-minute walking test, compared to those with mild-moderate asthma. Interestingly, exercise capacity (assessed by both 6MWD and 6MWWork) and overall physical activity (assessed by IPAQ), were similar between the groups. To the author’s knowledge, this is the first study indicating that cardiovascular reserve may be decreased in subjects with severe disease, without evident impairment of exercise capacity.
Both the variables that compose a double product, systolic blood pressure and heart rate, are predictors of disability in the general population [21, 22]. The double product, as an index of myocardial oxygen consumption [23, 24], has been previously used in combination with exercise tests, mostly among patients with cardiovascular disorders. Patients with coronary heart disease presented an attenuated increase in DP during exercise testing [25-27], while DP was significantly increased after 6MWT among patients with heart failure, compared to controls . Data regarding patients with respiratory disorders are currently scarce. Tzani et al. indicated that Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with dynamic hyperinflation have a poor cardiovascular response to exercise, compared to patients without dynamic hyperinflation, as indicated by lower DP . Reduced left ventricle stroke volume, as a result of a decreased venous return due to high intrathoracic pressure , has been proposed as the main reason; however, in our study, resting lung volumes were similar between the groups, while no correlations were established between DP and lung function variables. Deconditioning is another parameter that has been previously associated with changes in DP among healthy subjects . Reduced physical performance, stemming from a sedentary lifestyle, is frequently encountered among asthmatics and has been associated with worse asthma symptoms . In our study, patients with severe asthma presented with significantly lower METs regarding moderate intensity physical activity, confirming these results. Moreover, DP was positively correlated to 6MWD (% predicted), indicating that the higher the exercise capacity, the better the cardiovascular reserve. Since no previous study has investigated the potential role of DP changes in assessing functional capacity and development of dynamic hyperinflation, especially in patients with severe asthma, this should be further studied in the future.
Although exercise capacity assessed by 6-minute walking distance was similar between the groups, certain differences were noted in physical activity intensity, indicating that these two assessments cannot be used indiscriminately in asthmatics. In the study of Janssen et al. where exercise capacity and physical activity were separately assessed, these two measures were concomitantly decreased only in one-third of asthmatics; in most of the rest, there was a significant deviation between exercise tolerance as assessed by 6-minute walking distance (“can do”) and daily step count, as assessed by an accelerometer (“do do”) . Moreover, in the study of Verlaet et al., less than half of asthmatic male and female patients reached physical activity recommendations , confirming our results. Surprisingly, although the level of control has been previously associated with both exercise capacity and physical activity levels [32, 33], in our study, only asthma severity established such an association. Further studies should investigate whether severe asthma is associated with specific permanent changes (respiratory and/or peripheral) that may impact physical capacity, irrespectively of the level of control.
The current report has certain strengths and limitations. The overall number of patients is quite small, and this may be the reason why no group differences were noted in FVC and FEV1 values. Moreover, no minimum clinical important difference is reported for DP in literature, while no study power calculation was conducted; however, no outlier was noted regarding DP, and its measured values had a similar trend, so it is highly unlikely results regarding DP to have been different with a bigger sample size. Currently, the majority of published studies refer either to patients with cardiovascular disorders, or to healthy population; the only study that has been conducted in patients with a respiratory disorder, and can be compared to our study, is the one of Tzani et al. , which included 48 COPD patients. Although these patients were much older with much more severe obstruction, compared to our study, the DP variation within the groups was similar to DP variation in our study. A strength of this pilot study is that the two groups were matched for sex, age and BMI and all data were prospectively collected, minimizing recall bias. Physical activity was not measured using a physical activity monitor, such as an accelerometer, but it was estimated vs IPAQ; however, this tool has been repeatedly used for the assessment of physical activity among subjects with chronic respiratory disorders [34, 35].
In conclusion, these preliminary results indicate that patients with severe asthma may have impaired cardiovascular reserve as established by DP at the end of 6-minute walking test, for the first time. As DP is an easy to calculate index, its routine assessment in patients with respiratory disorders may provide further information regarding their functional capacity. Future studies are necessary to investigate the association between DP and maximum exercise capacity, as assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing and to reveal the potential impact of asthma severity and level of control on its values.
ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE
The study protocol was approved by the the Scientific Review Board Committee of General Hospital “G. Papanikolaou”, Greece.
HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS
No animals were used in this research. All human research procedures were followed in accordance with the ethical standards of the committee responsible for human experimentation (institutional and national), and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2013.
CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION
All patients provided informed, written consent for study participation,
STANDARDS OF REPORTING
STROBE guidelines and methodologies were followed in this study.
AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.
|||2020 GINA Main Report. Global Initiative for Asthma - GINA. 2020. Available from: https://ginasthma.org/gina-reports/|
|||Panagiotou M, Koulouris NG, Rovina N. Physical activity: A missing link in asthma care. J Clin Med 2020; 9(3): E706.
|||Worsnop CJ. Asthma and physical activity. Chest 2003; 124(2): 421-2.
|||Hernandes NA, Wouters EFM, Meijer K, Annegarn J, Pitta F, Spruit MA. Reproducibility of 6-minute walking test in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J 2011; 38(2): 261-7.
|||Giannitsi S, Bougiakli M, Bechlioulis A, Kotsia A, Michalis LK, Naka KK. 6-minute walking test: a useful tool in the management of heart failure patients. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis 2019; 13: 1753944719870084.
|||Oliveira MJ, Marçôa R, Moutinho J, et al. Reference equations for the 6-minute walk distance in healthy Portuguese subjects 18-70 years old. Pulmonology 2019; 25(2): 83-9.
|||Le V-V, Mitiku T, Sungar G, Myers J, Froelicher V. The blood pressure response to dynamic exercise testing: a systematic review. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2008; 51(2): 135-60.
|||Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35(8): 1381-95.
|||European Commission-European opinion research group. Physical Activity. Special Eurobarometer. 2003 Dec. Report No.: 183-6/Wave 58. 2003. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_183_6_en.pdf|
|||Nathan RA, Sorkness CA, Kosinski M, et al. Development of the asthma control test: a survey for assessing asthma control. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 113(1): 59-65.
|||Grammatopoulou EP, Stavrou N, Myrianthefs P, et al. Validity and reliability evidence of the Asthma Control Test--ACT in Greece. J Asthma 2011; 48(1): 57-64.
|||Juniper EF, O’Byrne PM, Roberts JN. Measuring asthma control in group studies: do we need airway calibre and rescue beta2-agonist use? Respir Med 2001; 95(5): 319-23.
|||Livadiotis C, Lambrinou E, Raftopoulos V, Middleton N. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Greek version of the Active Life with Asthma (Gr-ALMA) review: a descriptive methodological study. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19(1): 322.
|||Graham BL, Steenbruggen I, Miller MR, et al. Standardization of spirometry 2019 update. An official american thoracic society and european respiratory society technical statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 200(8): e70-88.
|||Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ, Baur X, Hall GL, Culver BH, et al. the ERS Global Lung function Initiative. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3-95 year age range: The global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J 2012; 40(6): 1324-43.
|||ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166(1): 111-7.
|||Muza SR, Silverman MT, Gilmore GC, Hellerstein HK, Kelsen SG. Comparison of scales used to quantitate the sense of effort to breathe in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990; 141(4 Pt 1): 909-13.
|||Borg G, Borg E. The borg CR Scales® folder 2010.|
|||Chetta A, Zanini A, Pisi G, et al. Reference values for the 6-min walk test in healthy subjects 20-50 years old. Respir Med 2006; 100(9): 1573-8.
|||Carter R, Holiday DB, Nwasuruba C, Stocks J, Grothues C, Tiep B. 6-minute walk work for assessment of functional capacity in patients with COPD. Chest 2003; 123(5): 1408-15.
|||Williams B, Lindholm LH, Sever P. Systolic pressure is all that matters. Lancet 2008; 371(9631): 2219-21.
|||Palatini P. Elevated heart rate: A “new” cardiovascular risk factor? Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2009; 52(1): 1-5.
|||Gobel FL, Norstrom LA, Nelson RR, Jorgensen CR, Wang Y. The rate-pressure product as an index of myocardial oxygen consumption during exercise in patients with angina pectoris. Circulation 1978; 57(3): 549-56.
|||Nelson RR, Gobel FL, Jorgensen CR, Wang K, Wang Y, Taylor HL. Hemodynamic predictors of myocardial oxygen consumption during static and dynamic exercise. Circulation 1974; 50(6): 1179-89.
|||Villella M, Villella A, Barlera S, Franzosi MG, Maggioni AP. Prognostic significance of double product and inadequate double product response to maximal symptom-limited exercise stress testing after myocardial infarction in 6296 patients treated with thrombolytic agents. GISSI-2 Investigators. Grupo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell-Infarto Miocardico. Am Heart J 1999; 137(3): 443-52.
|||Sadrzadeh Rafie AH, Sungar GW, Dewey FE, Hadley D, Myers J, Froelicher VF. Prognostic value of double product reserve. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2008; 15(5): 541-7.
|||Schutte R, Thijs L, Asayama K, et al. Double product reflects the predictive power of systolic pressure in the general population: evidence from 9,937 participants. Am J Hypertens 2013; 26(5): 665-72.
|||Domka-Jopek E, Jopek A, Bejer A, Lenart-Domka E, Walawski G. The importance of the double product in the six-minute walk test to predict myocardial function. BioMed Res Int 2018; 2018: 3082690.
|||Tzani P, Aiello M, Elia D, et al. Dynamic hyperinflation is associated with a poor cardiovascular response to exercise in COPD patients. Respir Res 2011; 12(1): 150.
|||Gilders RM, Voner C, Dudley GA. Endurance training and blood pressure in normotensive and hypertensive adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1989; 21(6): 629-36.
|||Ramos E, de Oliveira LVF, Silva AB, et al. Peripheral muscle strength and functional capacity in patients with moderate to severe asthma. Multidiscip Respir Med 2015; 10(1): 3.
|||Janssen SMJ, Spruit MA, Antons JC, et al. “Can do” versus “do do” in patients with asthma at first referral to a pulmonologist. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2021; 9(3): 1278-84.
|||Verlaet A, Moreira A, Sá-Sousa A, et al. Physical activity in adults with controlled and uncontrolled asthma as compared to healthy adults: a cross-sectional study. Clin Transl Allergy 2013; 3(1): 1.
|||Andersson M, Stridsman C, Rönmark E, Lindberg A, Emtner M. Physical activity and fatigue in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - A population based study. Respir Med 2015; 109(8): 1048-57.
|||Sánchez Castillo S, Smith L, Díaz Suárez A, López Sánchez GF. Associations between physical activity and comorbidities in people with copd residing in spain: A cross-sectional analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(2): E594.